Legal Insights

Post categories
Select category
All (307)
Alternatives to Court (12)
Annulment vs Divorce (3)
Areas We Service (9)
Child Protection (11)
Child Support (32)
Common Law Relationships (2)
COVID-19 (5)
Division of Property (18)
Domestic Violence (5)
Enforcing Support (7)
Fertility Law (6)
Financial Disclosure (10)
Income for Support Purposes (4)
Marriage Contracts (4)
Matrimonial Home (10)
Parenting Coordination (1)
Parenting Time and Decision Making (31)
Pensions (4)
Procedure (59)
Real Estate (8)
Relocation (2)
Separation & Divorce (19)
Social Work & Separation (2)
Spousal Support (32)
Uncategorized (3)
Wills & Estates (9)

Your marriage is ending, and someone just handed you a separation agreement template they downloaded online. It looks official - filled with legal language about parenting schedules and spousal support. You're thinking about filling it in yourself because hiring a lawyer seems expensive when you're already worried about splitting assets and supporting two households. I know this because separation agreements fail when people treat them like simple contracts instead of the legally binding documents that will govern their financial and parenting futures for years to come. A properly structured separation agreement protects your rights to your home, your children, and your financial security - but only if it addresses the critical elements that Ontario family law requires. Here's what most people miss about separation agreements, why DIY templates create problems that cost thousands to fix later, and when legal help shifts from optional to absolutely critical. What Makes a Separation Agreement Legally Binding in Ontario A separation agreement becomes enforceable when it meets specific legal requirements. You can't just write down your arrangements and expect courts to uphold them. The document must be in writing and signed by both parties. That seems obvious, but here's what catches people - your...

Krol & Krol

You thought you knew your spouse after fifteen years of marriage, but the person sitting across from you at the kitchen table feels like a stranger. They're talking about dividing assets you haven't even thought about, mentioning lawyers' names, and suddenly you realize - you have no idea how to navigate this. We've watched hundreds of Ontario couples stumble through separation, and the same costly divorce mistakes surface again and again. Here's what you need to know to protect yourself, your children, and your future during one of life's most challenging transitions. Key Takeaways Document everything now: Financial records disappear faster than you think Stay in the family home: Moving out doesn't mean what you think it does Avoid verbal agreements: Text messages aren't separation agreements Keep children neutral: Using kids as messengers destroys more than marriages Get professional help early: DIY separation often costs more than hiring experts The Financial Documentation Disaster A big mistake people often make is assuming financial information will always be easily available. One day you have access to online banking, investment statements, and tax returns. The next day, passwords change and documents vanish. This isn't necessarily malicious - sometimes it's just one spouse taking...

Krol & Krol

After a recent separation, a prospective family lawyer just quoted a per-hour fee, and you're calculating how many hours of meetings, phone calls, and court appearances may lie ahead. The numbers can induce stress and anxiety. This can unfortunately be the financial reality of the cost of divorce in Ontario, where ending a marriage or cohabitation can cost anywhere from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars or even more. We have helped clients navigate these waters for years, and can tell you that understanding divorce costs upfront, knowing your options, and avoiding critical divorce mistakes can make all the difference.  Key Takeaways Lawyer rates vary wildly: From an average of $250 per hour for a junior lawyer in Ontario to $800+ for experienced counsel, especially in Toronto. Mediation saves money: Mediation can be significantly cheaper, more efficient, and less stressful than Court and Litigation.   Complexity drives cost: Parties that act reasonably and fairly spend less than those involved in high-conflict cases, where they allow emotion to get the better of them.  Extra costs add up: Financial experts, valuations and reports, counseling, and even renovations/moving expenses when selling property do add to the overall cost.  Cost of Divorce:...

Krol & Krol

The Family Responsibility Office (FRO) is Ontario's government agency responsible for collecting and distributing child and spousal support payments. When a court issues a support order, the FRO acts as an intermediary, ensuring payments flow from the person paying support to the person receiving it. The FRO also has enforcement powers including wage garnishment, license suspension, and bank account seizure when payments are missed. While family lawyers help you obtain or modify support orders through the courts, the FRO handles the practical side of support enforcement. The FRO cannot change support amounts or resolve custody disputes. The FRO's role is purely administrative: collecting payments, tracking arrears, and enforcing court orders when someone fails to pay. Understanding how the FRO works is essential whether you're paying or receiving support. This guide explains the FRO's enforcement timeline, your options for withdrawal, and what to do if you receive an FRO notice. You'll learn which enforcement actions happen first, how quickly they escalate, and when legal intervention becomes necessary. Key Insights FRO enrollment is mandatory for most support orders issued after March 1, 1997, with limited exceptions for joint withdrawal agreements Enforcement escalates gradually starting with warnings and wage garnishment within 2-4 weeks before moving to license suspension...

Krol & Krol

In certain circumstances, a party can request an ex parte order from the courts by bringing an ex parte motion. In Latin, ex parte literally means "from one party." This type of motion is requested by one of the parties, without notice to the other party involved. The opposing party usually only hears about an order granted after it is already being enforced. Ex parte orders are usually only granted in response to extreme situations and in circumstances when an immediate temporary order is necessary.  Often, these orders are sought when an immediate decision is necessary in order to protect a child or for the moving party's own protection. When a party brings an ex parte motion, the situation is presented only from the point of view of the party who is requesting the order. Accordingly, only the moving party's version of the facts will be presented to the judge, without the judge hearing both parties’ perspectives and both sides of the story. The onus in on the party bringing the ex parte motion to convince the judge that it is imperative that the requested order be granted. It is important to present all the facts of the case and not...

Krol & Krol

According to Ontario law, both parties involved in the divorce process are required to disclose specific information to one another. For example, they are required to provide financial disclosure to each other in order to properly divide their financial affairs. Whether or not the obligation to disclose information during the divorce process in Ontario extends to third parties, also known as individuals who are not the two people trying to obtain a legal divorce, is not as clear-cut. It is possible that the court will compel third parties to produce specific documents, to testify, or provide evidence that apply to the divorce process in Ontario. Circumstances whereby one party is acquiring additional non-disclosed income, and the evidence to prove so lies with a third party, are circumstances whereby the court may require individuals besides the two parties getting divorced, to provide evidence. If an individual wishes to have a third party compelled by the Ontario courts to disclose specific evidence, they must prove the following: That the information is necessary to prove an aspect of the court case; That the information is relevant to the issues at hand; That it would be unfair to the individual if the information was...

Krol & Krol